The web's most comprehensive user-interactive handloading database! Find the loading data created by handloaders, for handloaders, post your pet loads, or access and develop your own online loading database with our LoadNotes personal handloading database software. This feature, unique in its concept and intuitive in it's data presentation is fast to access, superbly organized and comprehensive in scope.Our online forums for questions and answers on many shooting and outdoor related topics. A dynamic, active, and well-informed resource for your enjoyment and interaction. Our most used resource on this website! Come share the experience with us!
» Advanced

Go Back   Shooters Forum > Handloading > Handloading Procedures/Practices
Register FAQ Members List Donate Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-16-2004, 04:56 AM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 47
280 and 300 grain 41 mag loads

Anyone care to suggest a starting load for either of these bullets.
I have 2400, H110, H4227, and Unique. I want to try Unique with the 300 grain bullet, and was thinking 7.5 grains to start.

300SSKPB
and
280LBTLWNGC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-16-2004, 08:27 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Jefferson Parish (via N.O.)
Posts: 9,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon Harriso
Anyone care to suggest a starting load for either of these bullets.
I have 2400, H110, H4227, and Unique. I want to try Unique with the 300 grain bullet, and was thinking 7.5 grains to start.

300SSKPB
and
280LBTLWNGC
Will look for published data as the bullets i worked with were not quite the same as anything out there and my results won't match.

OF the powders listed, PLEASE start your work with H4227. It may not be the best powder, but it will be the hardest to get into trouble with...considering the volume of the case left after seating tose heavy bullets, it will be hard to get a serious over load into a case. Once you get a handle on H4227, then can work with the others.

Unique is a bit faster than the others listed, and heavy bullets with faster powders tend to run pressure up quickly.

---------
Long time ago, when the .41mag. was a baby, they didn't quite know how it was going to be used. Lyman made some 210gr. HBWC molds. By making new hollow base plugs (some not hollow based) and seating backwards, made various weights from 210gr. to 340gr. with RN, SWC, or FN shapes.

Now these probably set a bit deeper than anything offered commercially in that weight, so my case volume was a bit liss...but IMR4227 was the accuracy choice. normally 4227 doesn't burn real well in revolver rounds, leaving a good bit of unburned powder littering the barrel...but with a heavy bullet, that powders seems to burn quite well. Won't be as fast as can be had with some of the other powders, but it's a good place to start looking for accuracy with near 100% loadfing density an safe pressures.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-16-2004, 12:13 PM
Marshall Stanton's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Idaho Panhandle
Posts: 3,372
Brandon,

There are some proven loads at www.LoadSwap.com with the 280gWLNGC bullets using both W296 and H4227. Here's the link:
http://www.loadswap.com/display.php?...cartridge_id=3

And for the 300g SSK bullet try this one also from LoadSwap.com

http://www.loadswap.com/display.php?...cartridge_id=3

This should get you started!

God Bless,
__________________
Marshall
Romans 1:16



Beartooth: A Bullet Worth Waiting For!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-16-2004, 03:30 PM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 47
Thanks, seems the starting points I had in mind were just right. Unless its cloudy or windy next weekend I will be able to chrono my loads (about 13) for my 41 and add to loadswap.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-16-2004, 04:04 PM
Marshall Stanton's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Idaho Panhandle
Posts: 3,372
We'll look forward to your results, and the new loadswap data you develop!

God bless,
__________________
Marshall
Romans 1:16



Beartooth: A Bullet Worth Waiting For!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-24-2004, 04:12 PM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 47
Well I sure did have some good shooting. I will get all the data on loadswap when I review my notes and enter them into my data base, but H4227 did pretty good with the 280's. Out of 7.5 8.0 and 8.5 the 8.0 was the best with Unique. 8.5 was opening the group back up. However 8.0 placed 10 shots way under 2 inches at 25 yards. The recoil was very mild and the sound was more like a thump than a crack. It was a pleasant experience and I had very little trouble with unique trying to cook the base of those bullets. 7.5 was 950 fps, 8.0 was 1000 fps, and with a large SD 8.5 was roughly 1050, but I could tell i was past the prime pressure.

I started with 18.6 and worked through 19.4 gr. of H4227 with the 280, and they all performed OK. I noticed that the SD were low in some loads, but the accuracy wasn't exceptional. I am still fairly low in velovity at around 1200 so I am deffinately going to go further with this. For now I will say the 18.6 is a very good mark to start with, and was very pleasant to shoot.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-25-2004, 04:04 PM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 47
Load Swap data is up. Chronograph is a brand new Oehler. I added a few more loads that I feel like might have some use.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-25-2004, 07:55 PM
Marshall Stanton's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Idaho Panhandle
Posts: 3,372
Brandon,
Many thanks for taking the time to post your work on LoadSwap.com! It's a great addition for those shooting the .41 Magnum. I appreciate your efforts!

God bless,
__________________
Marshall
Romans 1:16



Beartooth: A Bullet Worth Waiting For!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-31-2004, 11:35 AM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 47
Going at it again with the 255 and 280.
The 255 is suposed to be the best performing most accurate bullet for the 41 mag. ( I have heard from a few sources) Frankly against the 280 from Marshal, I am not so much impressed. I am putting these two head to head. I allready have a good load for deer with the 280, so now I am just playing.

Now i don't wanna step on anyones toes, but I see 21.0 grains of w296 getting 1350 fps or so. Now I am going to asume this was a cool burning lot. Lots of people say 296 adn H110 are interchangable, however in this case I am going to drop on back. I think 17.6 or so will be a good starting point for all using the 280 with H110.....................Ima start there adn work up pretty strong.

Will hopefully get this stuff through the skyscreens Sat.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:18 PM.

< Contact Us - Shooters Forum - Archive >

 
 

All Content & Design Copyright © 1999-2002 Beartooth Bullets, All Rights Reserved
View Privacy Policy | Contact Webmaster | Legal Information
Website Design & Development By Exbabylon Internet Solutions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2