» Advanced

Go Back   Shooters Forum > Handloading > Handloading Procedures/Practices
Register FAQ Members List Donate Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2009, 03:27 PM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 517
H4831 vs H4831SC


Registered Users do not see the above ad.


Other than the fact that it meters easier, what is the difference between H4831 and H4831SC? I see many loads for the .338 Lapua using the short cut but not many for the standard.
Thanks,

Kudu40
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2009, 04:55 PM
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,900
I've read that the two are supposed to be the 'same'. While I have loaded some SC powder (30-06), I don't recall any significant excursions in performance from the non-SC powder in my load, and it's been long enough that anyone should work up new loads as normal anyway. I don't have a 338 Lapua, although the case mouth is large enough that powder flow isn't a problem. It may come out of the dispenser better without that grating grinding sound, but the non-SC likely isn't a problem in feeding into the case! Don't know if there's a price difference in the std vs the SC version?
__________________
NRA Endowment Member
SCI Member
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2009, 05:22 PM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Mooresville, IN
Posts: 9,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by kudu40 View Post
Other than the fact that it meters easier, what is the difference between H4831 and H4831SC? I see many loads for the .338 Lapua using the short cut but not many for the standard.
Thanks,

Kudu40
I haven't used the SC powder yet, but 4831 has never metered well out of my powder measure, which has forced me to weigh each charge. This isn't a big deal since I don't shoot 1,000 rounds of .270 a year, but I wouldn't turn my nose up at something that dropped out of the tube more consistently.
__________________
Ask me about QDMA.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2009, 06:34 PM
The Troll Whisperer (Moderator)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 19,762
Always measure all centerfire cartridges with a scale, so don't know how well the SC measures as compared to the longer stick H4831.

Switched over to the SC when it came out because its supposed to be temprature insensitive. Can't notice any difference between it and the regular 4831 as far as pressures/velocities.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member
NRA Certified Police Firearms Instructor
NRA Certified Range Safety Officer
NAHC Life Member

"Firearms only have two enemies - rust and politicans" author unknown
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2009, 06:51 PM
unclenick's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hilliard, Ohio
Posts: 10,897
The shorter cut is designed to meter more easily, but longer grains are easier to get consistent ignition from. Hatcher wrote about working up a load for National Match ammunition one year (back when the military still supplied the ammo for matches) in which he had two powders very similar to what is now IMR4320. One had grains 1/22" long and the other had longer 1/11" grains. The former would meter within an extreme spread of 0.6 grains in the arsenal loading machines, while the latter was much more difficult for it, producing an extreme spread of 1.7 grains; a big number by a modern reloader's standards. Yet, in machine rest testing, the sloppier load of the coarser grained powder was consistently more accurate.

Hatcher believed easier passage of the flame front through the coarser grains was responsible for achieving ignition enough better to overwhelm the better consistency of the finer grain loads. He also said that new records were set at the nationals with that coarse grained ammunition. He reported that some know-it-all pulled some bullets an pronounced it inferior because the charge variation was higher than the ammunition issued the year before. The records somehow escaped this fellow's notice.

The bottom line is that until you work up loads with both, you won't know which version might do better in your gun, or if you will see any difference at all? If you are lucky enough to find a charge weight-indifferent load as Hatcher did, you won't really care about the metering precision much. At that point, you can just get one of the inexpensive Lee Perfect measures to use with it, which will do about as well as any with coarse sticks. The only measure I know of that does better with them is the JDS Quick Measure. It's design can't cut grains, and my copy is never off by more than .2 grains. More usually the error is half that. But it costs more than the Lee.
__________________
Nick
__________________________
Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member
"First contemplation of the problems of Interior Ballistics gives the impression that they should yield rather easily to relatively simple methods of analysis. Further study shows the subject to be of almost unbelievable complexity." Homer Powley
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-03-2009, 02:49 AM
dmsbandit's Avatar
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,826
The shorter grains of SC may allow you to get a little more powder in the cases, but the burn rate of the two varieties should be the same.
__________________
"I don't drink or smoke, I spend my money on gunpowder and gasoline."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Imr 4831 Vs H4831 scottg Handloading Procedures/Practices 13 02-06-2009 05:04 PM
More sensitive to temp. IMR7828 or H4831? beartracker Rifles and Rifle Cartridges 5 05-13-2007 09:13 PM
H4831sc vs. H4831 steelydan Handloading Procedures/Practices 7 01-05-2007 07:45 AM
H4831SC powder USA-80 Handloading Procedures/Practices 5 01-03-2006 02:52 AM
H4831sc jim johnson Handloading Procedures/Practices 6 07-20-2005 07:50 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:36 AM.

< Contact Us - Shooters Forum - Archive >

 
 

All Content & Design Copyright © 1999-2002 Beartooth Bullets, All Rights Reserved
View Privacy Policy | Contact Webmaster | Legal Information
Website Design & Development By Exbabylon Internet Solutions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2