
10-15-2012, 10:26 AM
|
 |
Beartooth Regular
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,487
|
|
|
Thought I'd follow up with just a tiny touch of 780-in-the-heat data.
I made up some 780 loads for my 243 (Browning BLR, 20" bbl) a couple months ago under Hornady 100-grain BTSPs. It was an increasing-charge series which topped out near, but as I recall just below, book-max (I don't have the figures here).
The hot weather testing resulted in a pierced primer with the highest charge, and WAAAY too-high velocity. Definitely seriously over-pressure. Ammo temps for that test were ~125F, and rifle temps were ~140F.
It's been cooler here recently, so I fired the 'extra' cartridges I hadn't fired in the heat (highest charge and one charge lower). Ammo temps were ~75F, and the rifle was not above very roughly 90F. No pierced primers this time, and the highest charge slowed down ~50+ ft/sec.
Now, this testing is a lot different than what one sees on the 'net when people claim EPVAT-style testing. That testing, when I've seen any explanation/elaboration, only alters ammo temp, but not rifle temp. This test saw a difference of ~50F in BOTH the ammo AND the rifle, and it resulted in very roughly a 1 foot/sec/degree change.
Whether that's good or poor temp-resistance, I guess I can't say. I'll not likely get a chance to do cold-weather testing of this powder, as I have no plans to buy more; I don't expect to shoot the heavies much in this rifle, and 780 is too slow for varmint-weight bullets.
__________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have." --Gerald Ford
|