The web's most comprehensive user-interactive handloading database! Find the loading data created by handloaders, for handloaders, post your pet loads, or access and develop your own online loading database with our LoadNotes personal handloading database software. This feature, unique in its concept and intuitive in it's data presentation is fast to access, superbly organized and comprehensive in scope.Our online forums for questions and answers on many shooting and outdoor related topics. A dynamic, active, and well-informed resource for your enjoyment and interaction. Our most used resource on this website! Come share the experience with us!
» Advanced

Go Back   Shooters Forum > Handloading > Handloading Procedures/Practices
Register FAQ Members List Donate Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-16-2012, 01:43 PM
Darkker's Avatar
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mesa, Washington
Posts: 1,308
Supreme 780 Temp sensitivity Q

I am fond of St. Marks ball powders.
My 308 and 223's LOVE Win 748, and I find them to be very stable in the heat. I developed my loads @ 60 degrees and they are very close to original above 90.
Win 760, not so much... Both my 243 and 25-06 aren't happy when the temp goes above the mid-80's.
So, has anyone had real experience with 780 in the heat? 760 isn't atrocious, but I am not a fan of having to down-load for the summer months.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2012, 06:23 AM
So Dakota's Avatar
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Western South Dakota
Posts: 193
I've had bad luck with Win 785 in hot weather. Never tried 780. I wish that a guy could look at a spreadsheet and see how sensitive that powder is to heat.

I've seen buddy's reasonable prairie dog loads developed in the winter go way hot in the summer. I try to shoot loads in the heat of summer if that is when I'll be using them. I keep notes with dates and temperatures of favorite loads. I am afraid that I write these notes in the reloading manuals as I won't as likely miss place those notes. Now I have some very old and ragged manuals around.

Some newer powders are getting better than the ones they replaced. Glad we are not stuck with cordite.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-17-2012, 07:42 AM
MZ5's Avatar
MZ5 MZ5 is offline
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,487
Do I recall correctly that you're considering 780, but don't have any yet? Send me some heavy 24-cals and I'll try to do some hot-weather testing for you in the 243. Comparisons to cool-to-cold, well, we'll have to think about that a little...

As an aside, I've read some VERY good things about the temp-resistance of the General Dynamics stuff being labeled by Alliant as 2000-MR. I don't know whether the entire PowerPro series does as well within their respective cartridge design parameters as 2000-MR does, but you might look that direction if you don't see what you want from the Win-labeled stuff.
__________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have." --Gerald Ford
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-18-2012, 02:11 PM
Darkker's Avatar
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mesa, Washington
Posts: 1,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by MZ5 View Post
Do I recall correctly that you're considering 780, but don't have any yet? Send me some heavy 24-cals and I'll try to do some hot-weather testing for you in the 243.
Am considering, but don't yet own; correct.
You should know by now I don't shoot heavy stuff, except in my 308.

If you have 780, I will send you some 24's & 25's....
But you can't just go plinking, I want load data from them
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-18-2012, 05:37 PM
MZ5's Avatar
MZ5 MZ5 is offline
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,487
Well, if you're gonna put a bunch of conditions on it, maybe you can get your own 'data!'

I'll try a few lightweights in the 243 if you want, but I think 780 might be too slow for them. Don't bother sending 25s. The WSSM is enough more efficient than the 25-06 that 760 is as slow as I can go for lightweights. Interestingly, 760 appears to be noticeably more heat-resistant In the 25 WSSM than it is in some other cartridges.
__________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have." --Gerald Ford
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-15-2012, 10:26 AM
MZ5's Avatar
MZ5 MZ5 is offline
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,487
Thought I'd follow up with just a tiny touch of 780-in-the-heat data.

I made up some 780 loads for my 243 (Browning BLR, 20" bbl) a couple months ago under Hornady 100-grain BTSPs. It was an increasing-charge series which topped out near, but as I recall just below, book-max (I don't have the figures here).

The hot weather testing resulted in a pierced primer with the highest charge, and WAAAY too-high velocity. Definitely seriously over-pressure. Ammo temps for that test were ~125F, and rifle temps were ~140F.

It's been cooler here recently, so I fired the 'extra' cartridges I hadn't fired in the heat (highest charge and one charge lower). Ammo temps were ~75F, and the rifle was not above very roughly 90F. No pierced primers this time, and the highest charge slowed down ~50+ ft/sec.

Now, this testing is a lot different than what one sees on the 'net when people claim EPVAT-style testing. That testing, when I've seen any explanation/elaboration, only alters ammo temp, but not rifle temp. This test saw a difference of ~50F in BOTH the ammo AND the rifle, and it resulted in very roughly a 1 foot/sec/degree change.

Whether that's good or poor temp-resistance, I guess I can't say. I'll not likely get a chance to do cold-weather testing of this powder, as I have no plans to buy more; I don't expect to shoot the heavies much in this rifle, and 780 is too slow for varmint-weight bullets.
__________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have." --Gerald Ford
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Winchester supreme 780 Tcrowe Handloading Procedures/Practices 6 03-29-2012 08:08 AM
Gun Issue Heats Up for Sotomayor as NRA Appeals to Supreme Court DOK General Discussion 1 06-04-2009 08:51 PM
45/70, RL7 and temp sensitivity EastTNHunter Handloading Procedures/Practices 3 01-02-2009 02:39 PM
WW Supreme 780 to be released Rocky Raab Handloading Procedures/Practices 6 10-31-2007 03:58 PM
Powder Temp and Position Sensitivity amndouglas Handloading Procedures/Practices 14 05-15-2004 09:23 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:09 AM.

< Contact Us - Shooters Forum - Archive >

 
 

All Content & Design Copyright © 1999-2002 Beartooth Bullets, All Rights Reserved
View Privacy Policy | Contact Webmaster | Legal Information
Website Design & Development By Exbabylon Internet Solutions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2