
11-13-2012, 06:04 AM
|
 |
The Hog Whisperer (Administrator)
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,119
|
|
|
Check the gun before you assume what the twist rate is. Marlin changed twist rates a few years ago and you could find either the old 1-38" or the newer 1-20" twist rates. If it's a Micro-Groove (should say so on the barrel but usually obvious by looking at the muzzle) then it's almost certainly the slower twist rate. 300 grains seems to be about the cut-off for the slow twist to stabilize. Some guns will and some won't.
The issue with the 1894 Marlins is feeding (in addition to the twist rate). While the 280gr. WFN would be idea (in my opinion) for that rifle, it may not feed. Marlin .44 mags have a gap at the back of the barrel where it meets the top of the receiver and these tend to hang up very blunt bullets. Oddly enough the .45 Colt guns did not have this gap and mine would feed bullets that were nearly cylindrical.
Anyway.... you probably will find best results with a narrower nose, I'd try the LFN style first. Bullet weight between 250 and 290 grains will probably all have about the same effect on the target, so might as well go a little lighter and cut down on recoil. The 1894s can surprise you with the effect on your shoulder.... My .45 Colt with 300 grain bullets smacked the snot out of me on the bench!
Seems, going from memory, good results have been reported with the 250gr. bullets by other forum members as regards to feeding.
__________________
MikeG
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by faucettb
Welcome to the forum. Rules are simple, be nice and join in.
|
|