
04-02-2004, 03:42 PM
|
 |
Beartooth Regular
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 158
|
|
|
336A -
Maybe I'm being overly cautious, but if I was going to hunt black bear (which I hope to do this fall), I would use a heavier bullet than a 7mm 140g.
For 20+ years I've used the 160g Speer Grand Slam with a max load of IMR4831 with excellent results - no lost animals and no tracking. Muzzle velocity is around 2900fps. Accuracy at 100 yards in my rifle is .5" and .4" in my buddy's rifle. At 300 yards we are still well under 2" when the wind isn't blowing. At 350 yards this bullet passed through a 6x5 elk on a broadside behind-the-shoulder shot. Only managed to recover one in all those years, and that one took out both shoulder joints of an elk.
Partitions work but have a reputation for losing the front core. I guess that doesn't matter if the animal dies quickly, but my preference is for bullets that hold together, and that preference is getting stronger as I get older. That means bonded-core bullets.
In the future I plan to try Swift Scirocco 160g bullets as they have a very heavy jacket, a bonded core and a higher Ballistic Coefficient. I also plan to try some of the newer Hodgdon powders, starting with H4831SC (since I already use that in my .257 Roberts) and moving to slower powders. I would think either the Swift Scirocco or A-Frame bullets would be excellent for bear.
The new Nosler Accubond bullets also have a bonded core but have a much lighter jacket than the Sciroccos. Still, I would probably prefer them over Partitions.
Other bullets I would reach for before the 140g Partition include the Speer Trophy Bonded and North Fork, both in 160g.
My 2 cents...
__________________
Coyote Hunter - NRA, GOA, DAD
|