
03-15-2008, 06:14 AM
|
 |
Beartooth Regular
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 566
|
|
|
Let me be the first to tell you: you're asking something of a "Ford Vs. Chevy" question here. Because they're the same price, it does make for a difficult decision. Many shooters will support both rifles. Almost everyone has an opinion on the .30-06 vs. .270 debate.
Here are some things to think about:
1) Pick up each rifle: how do they feel? (Weight, size, etc.) This might a bigger difference than you think. Some guns just don't 'fit' some people. Don't assume any gun will 'fit' you.
2) Is the shop a Browning or Tikka/Beretta dealer? That might make a difference down the line if you ever have a problem with the gun, or want parts.
3) The calibers from which your choosing negate any serious question about what you're hunting. Although, the .30-06 can take heavier loads if you needed it.
4) Related to #2, and this is where this board will be useful: how's Browning's customer service? I have a Tikka, and dealing with Beretta (they own Tikka) can be a bit of a pain. Again, this is sort of a worst-case question, but in the off chance you have problems, you want them addressed quickly, and properly.
These are a few of things to consider when buying a rifle. Again, the debate between brands and calibers can go on forever.
But since you asked....I have a .270 Tikka Laminated Stainless. Love it. Shoots better than I can. Very "carriable" and it's their heaviest, I think. Oh, and it looks great (for whats thats worth). Downside: expensive mags ($65+). And like I said, Beretta isn't the best to deal with.
Good luck,
jonas
|