» Advanced

Go Back   Shooters Forum > Rifle and Rifle Cartridges > Rifles and Rifle Cartridges
Register FAQ Members List Donate Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2010, 09:32 AM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 2,697
375 H&H recoil


Registered Users do not see the above ad.


How does the recoil of a 375 H&H stack up against a 45-70, hot loaded from a Marlin Guide Gun?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-26-2010, 11:08 AM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 503
Quote:
Originally Posted by leverite View Post
How does the recoil of a 375 H&H stack up against a 45-70, hot loaded from a Marlin Guide Gun?
If you had Pachmayr recoil pads on both and the Marlin weighed 6.5 lbs and the .375H&H weighed 9.5 lbs - then it's kinda the difference between getting soundly thumped with a 4x4 vs getting smacked with a 2x4. The .375 has more mass, but not as harsh. Both will bruise you if you go to the range in t-shirt.
__________________
.
.
. . . .
"They got us pinned down. How many of 'em are there?"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-26-2010, 12:34 PM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 2,697
So the 375 is the slower moving 4x4...and the 45-70's the 2x4?

I've been thinking about getting a 375 H&H or 375 RUger and selling my 45-70's. I think the 375 thumper would be just as effective for close work, but would have a longer effective range.

I can handle the 45-70 recoil, despite the colorful bruises, but I hear that the 375 is too horrible for some to handle.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-26-2010, 04:05 PM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 783
It all depends on the rifle!
My Marlin in .45-70 generally hurts more than my old .375 did, but one was light and one was heavy. Also, the stock configurations are different.
Apples and oranges. You would have to try one.
But, the .375 is not that difficult to manage, normally because they are built in heavier rifles.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-26-2010, 04:07 PM
MMichaelAK's Avatar
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 3,661
Between a buddy's Marlin 1895 shooting hot 405 grain loads and my Ruger #1 in .375 H&H shooting 2500 fps 300 grain loads, the Marlin has very little recoil in my opinion. His is the longer barrel model and not the guide gun so that adds some weight to his. My .375 weighs 8 1/4 pounds with Leupold 2-7x33 VX1 and after 30 rounds, I have a headache from the pounding.

It has some recoil but the only time I have ever gotten a bruised shoulder is when I didnt have it tucked in nice and snug before I touched it off. If it gets a running start, it will slap the snot out of you. Figure its about 2 1/2 times the felt recoil in pounds of a similar weight 30-06 with 180s.

That being said, it will do anything you asked of your 45-70 and a lot more. It is Not the sharp fast slam of the 300 WM or 338 WM so it is easier to roll with and it out hits both of those.
__________________
Be popular? Heck, I have enough friends.
and...
"That way lies madness".
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-26-2010, 04:59 PM
magnumitis's Avatar
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 952
Quote:
Originally Posted by cvc944 View Post
One more thing, you may find the lighter 270 grain bullets for thin skinned game are easier on the shoulder than the 300 grain buff busters.
Maybe. Maybe not.

I've only spent a little time behind a .375 H&H. It was an A-Bolt. It was very pleasant to shoot in a T-shirt. A bit more than the .300 Mag's. But not hateful in any manner.

I have spent gobs of time behind my .375 Weatherby. It is a completely different critter........just at about the limit of what I'd call "fun" to shoot. My pet load is a 250 gr. Sierra at 3060 fps. I can really tell no difference between it and a 300 grainer going 2800 fps. Maybe there technically is a difference. But it is not too significant.

Your best bet is to find somebody that has an H&H that will let you run a box through it. You be the judge.
__________________
"Too much gun always beats the alternative."
Elmer Keith
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-26-2010, 05:09 PM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 2,697
I tried to analyse it mathematically, but there's many variables, including stock design.

My 45-70 GG will throw a 300 grain bullet at about 2100 fps, the 375 Ruger will push a 300 grainer at 2800 fps. That's 33% more momentum for the 375 Ruger, assuming powder charges are about the same.

However, the Marlin GG stock is not the best for spreading recoil...and it's lighter than the 375 Ruger's. Still...would think the 375's have more push back.

Don't think I'd enjoy shooting 20 rounds w/ my GG unless I had on my pad.

Hmmm...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-26-2010, 07:24 PM
MikeG's Avatar
The Hog Whisperer (Administrator)
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,462
Marlin stock design is not the best at heavy recoil, my opinion. Makes them kick worse than they should.

Too difficult to compare!
__________________
MikeG

Quote:
Originally Posted by faucettb
Welcome to the forum. Rules are simple, be nice and join in.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-26-2010, 09:52 PM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 605
I wouldn't get rid of your .45-70 just yet. Try the .375 H&H first. I loved mine, but I had a nice wood stock on mine and it weighed almost 10 pounds. A lot of fun to shoot offhand or field positions where you could simply let your body rock to absorb the recoil. One of my boys loved it so much he "inhereted" it. Had no problem burning up a couple boxes of 270 grain ammo ... other than the cost of the ammo. After 40 rounds off the bench though he did twitch a mite.
__________________
"It is the province of knowledge to speak and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". Oliver Wendell Holmes
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-27-2010, 12:32 AM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Raymond, Washington
Posts: 105
Like everyone said, the answer is it depends.
I've found the stock design of the Marlin to cause the 45-70 or 444 to be less pleasant than it needs to be. For one thing I find that where my thumb wraps around the top of the stock to be too close to my nose.
The 375 can be a fairly easy shooter, depending on the rifle.
A buddy took his ruger number 1 and had a brass rod turned to just fit in the hole in the stock where the action is attached to the stock. The extra weight helps it out.
A quality stock is huge in how a thumper feels under recoil, so take that into consideration when looking for the 375 of your dreams. Great round for whatever you are after. I love the 45-70, but you are right. The 375 give you more range.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-27-2010, 04:42 AM
TMan's Avatar
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ - But Not For Long :)
Posts: 3,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by leverite View Post
I hear that the 375 is too horrible for some to handle.
You never have to wonder if the gun went off, that's for sure.

I gave up .375's when I bought my first .35 Whelen. But I loaded and shot the two I had quite a bit, and they were fine elk rifles. Recoil wise, I shot a .375 and a 12 GA slug gun side by side more than once. I also had the opportunity to shoot a Ruger No.3 in 45-70 on a couple of occassions. A 3" Federal slug and the No.3 were both harder kickers than my .375's.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-27-2010, 07:44 AM
magnumitis's Avatar
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 952
Quote:
Originally Posted by leverite View Post
........ the 375 Ruger will push a 300 grainer at 2800 fps.
Not at SAAMI pressures, it won't. A 270 grainer at 2800.....yes. A 300 grainer at 2800.......no.
__________________
"Too much gun always beats the alternative."
Elmer Keith
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-27-2010, 08:44 AM
DOK DOK is offline
"Bad Joke Friday" Dan (moderator emeritus)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Iowa
Posts: 7,717
I assume you're aware this site has a recoil calculator.....http://www.beartoothbullets.com/rescources/index.htm

I appreciate it doesn't calculate "felt recoil", but it may be helpful for you.
__________________
DOK
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-27-2010, 09:02 AM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Up North
Posts: 156
If you have a hankering for a 375 H&H, I would suggest to just go for it and not be too concerned with recoil. You can always make reduced loads for it. For example, the Hornady Handbook lists loads for the 270gr bullet from 2300 to 2700 fps.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-27-2010, 09:27 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 507
The 375 H&H can be a real kicker with normal loads, I would not load anything too hot for the 45-70. I own both, the 45-70 with factory loads can be stout, where the 375 can be painful.

You should check you Tube for video clips of people firing heavy caliber rifles.

Jerry
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-27-2010, 09:35 AM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Etowah, NC.
Posts: 279
This might help.

http://kwk.us/recoil.html
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-27-2010, 09:54 AM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 2,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by DOK View Post
I assume you're aware this site has a recoil calculator.....http://www.beartoothbullets.com/rescources/index.htm

I appreciate it doesn't calculate "felt recoil", but it may be helpful for you.

Cool!

31/17 for the 45-70, 47/19 for the 375 Ruger...recoil energy/recoil velocity.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-27-2010, 10:00 AM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 2,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by argo View Post
This might help.

http://kwk.us/recoil.html
Very cool, as well.

The recoil numbers for the 375 are much larger all around.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-27-2010, 01:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In a State of Confusion
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by leverite View Post
Very cool, as well.

The recoil numbers for the 375 are much larger all around.
Depends very much on the weight of the rifle in question.

Ruger Hawkeye Alaskan, weighs in right at 8lbs with iron sights.

270gr bullet @ 2800+/- fps gives 48.26ft/lbs
9lbs drops it to 42, and 10 lbs 38

Marlin 1895G weighs 7lbs give or take

300gr bullet @ 2100 is 34 ft/lbs
8lbs is 30 and 9lbs is 27. Around or a little under what a 300 Win Mag would be.

You take the Ruger up to 300gr @ 2600 you will be pushing 50 ft/lbs

Marlin with 405gr @ 1750 is 42 ft.lbs

Hope all this helps. In my experience the .375 Ruger's do not feel that bad, because the Hogue stock is very well designed and has a great recoil pad.


-Jason D
__________________
Recoil is God's way of letting you know the power in which you hold
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-28-2010, 03:35 PM
MMichaelAK's Avatar
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 3,661
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMan View Post
You never have to wonder if the gun went off, that's for sure.

I gave up .375's when I bought my first .35 Whelen. But I loaded and shot the two I had quite a bit, and they were fine elk rifles. Recoil wise, I shot a .375 and a 12 GA slug gun side by side more than once. I also had the opportunity to shoot a Ruger No.3 in 45-70 on a couple of occassions. A 3" Federal slug and the No.3 were both harder kickers than my .375's.
Tman, I had a Ruger #3 in 45-70 for a while. I liked it and loaded some pretty good stuff including some Poor Man's .458 WinMag type rounds. Yes, being a very light rifle it did KICK with those. It was never the kick that my Ruger #1 in 375 H&H has.
I sold it to finance the .45-70 I REALLY wanted.
__________________
Be popular? Heck, I have enough friends.
and...
"That way lies madness".
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
375 JDJ for Thompson Encore dshusker Handguns 9 10-27-2013 07:12 AM
35 Rem...recoil Big_Bore_Canada Marlin 336 Lever Guns 25 11-07-2010 06:02 PM
375 HH mag or 375 RUM?? frenchy Rifles and Rifle Cartridges 16 02-06-2010 03:12 PM
Can I: Swap 375 H&H barrel with 300 H&H on a Pre-64 Winchester Tebsinar Gunsmithing 4 05-03-2009 09:38 PM
375 dies for 38-55? Taylor Handloading Equipment 1 08-21-2008 06:43 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:22 PM.

< Contact Us - Shooters Forum - Archive >

 
 

All Content & Design Copyright © 1999-2002 Beartooth Bullets, All Rights Reserved
View Privacy Policy | Contact Webmaster | Legal Information
Website Design & Development By Exbabylon Internet Solutions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2