
01-14-2013, 08:28 AM
|
 |
Beartooth Regular
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 121
|
|
|
T/C Contender
Quote:
Originally Posted by broom_jm
I guess it's all a matter of perspective. The thread was about the Contender maybe not being made any longer. I felt it was important for folks who might read this thread, and not know about the strength of the two types of frames.
The 45/70, according to most folks, has punishing recoil, from a Contender. Sierra states in their reloading notes: "At nowhere in these data is recoil not objectionable." I've only shot one half a dozen times, but it was FAR more recoil than any of my other Contender barrels. I'd never want a 45/70, in a handgun.
|
Yes, I guess I wasn't paying attention, this thread is clearly about Contenders and not Encores, sorry for lapse into unconsciousness. I have a Contender barrel in 444 Marlin, and I think it recoils a bit more than the 45-70, but if it does it's because the whole rig is lighter than an Encore. I can't help what the Sierra loading manual says about recoil, I think it is more a matter of opinion. I shoot the two 45-70 barrels I have often, usually the one with the muzzle brake is used with a butt stock, It doesn't recoil as much as my Ruger #1. I use only 300 and 350 grain bullets and that would certainly make a difference.
__________________
If its got a cork, I'll drink it - if it's got a tune, I'll dance to it - if it's got a trigger, I'll shoot it - if it's got hair, I'll ride it
|