
01-21-2012, 01:50 PM
|
|
Beartooth Regular
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 451
|
|
|
equivelant recoil
Hi Gat Guy,
You may be off the mark here. The 375 std Mag. is or was, listed in S. Africa, as the 9.5 Afrikaner. It uses less powder than the longer 375 H&H, but equals or maybe even surpasses the Holland's velocities. It's a more modern bottle necked case, what! I was just trying to show you how to kill two birds with one stone. If you squeeze down a 375 Taylor case to near that of the sloping Hollands, then it will take a few less grains of powder. If you slightly blow out, a 375 H&H you will use somewhat more than the 95 grs. of capacity, but without gaining the efficiency of the sharper bottle necked Taylors. But this idea would feed nicely through your P-14 rifle. I was suggesting that you only blow out the Holland's chamber enough to produce a proper head spacing datum point on your wildcat. So, it would still have the lower efficiency of the Hollands design, but you could use re formed 300 Win Mag cases as well. John Sundra kept all of the Winnie Mag's capacity, but cut a longer neck so that the Hollands case would also chamber. So, the actual recoil of all of these, excepting the Sundras, will be nearly identical. If a more efficient case spits out the same bullet at the same velocities, then the felt recoil will be nearly identical too. I'm thinking that your P-14 would have pretty close to the capacity of the new 375 Ruger, but less than the Sundras or the very similar 375 Weatherby. Your P-14 is a CRF rifle, designed for a streamlined cartridge. They have been made up in 300 and 375 Hollands, for many decades. My other point is that if I can squeeze down a virgin 375 Ruger case body in my F.L. die, than so can you squeeze down the 300 Win Mag cases. The downside is that you will have to design a full length Hollands reamer, and send some blown out 375 H&H cases back to your die grinder, as samples. Only after you receive your F.L. sizing die, will you be able to re-form 300 Win Mag cases with it, to get your short necked variants. I am suggesting, tongue in cheek of course, that you name this kitty, the 38 Giglio, as something that can keel over a Whale of a Critter. It's a little less menacing than the 38 G.G. for Gat Guy. All things being equal, this number should be a bit more accurate than the same G.S.'ing effort in making up a sloping magnum wildcat, which head spaces on the belt, alone.
|