EGW Rail Doesn't Fit - Shooters Forum
» Advanced

Go Back   Shooters Forum > Sporting Optics > Rifle, Shotgun and Handgun Scopes
Register FAQ Members List Donate Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Like Tree4Likes
  • 2 Post By MikeG
  • 1 Post By duane
  • 1 Post By Purist
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-20-2017, 11:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3
EGW Rail Doesn't Fit


Registered Users do not see the above ad.


Hello wise forum members, a newbie here. Well, new to this forum anyway.

I could use your help. I recently bought an EGW 20 MOA rail for a long action Browning A-Bolt. The rail mounted easily and appears to fit well, EXCEPT the rail is offset about 0.05" too far back to match up with the ejection port and the front and back of the receiver. It is functional but just looks bad. I called EGW and they said there drawing shows the rear screw hole centered at 0.500" from the back of the receiver. I measured the rail and it is correct. However, the screw hole on the gun measures 0.45". So, I called Browning and asked if the locations had changed over time since this rifle is from the late 1990's. They said the hole locations had not changed and they could not remember seeing any mistdriiled holes on their rifles. However, they would not tell me what the correct measurement is but I could send the rifle in to them to be checked. Both EGW and Browning said that if their was a problem, they would have heard about it. So, my question is who is correct?

Oh, one more piece of information to complicate the issue. At the same time, I also bought the short action A-Bolt version rail and mounted it on a second A-Bolt I own. This rifle is also from the late 1990's. When I mounted it, lo and behold, it has the same exact problem as the long action. So, what is going on? Have any of you had a similar experience?

Thank you in advance for any help you might provide.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-20-2017, 07:56 PM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Remote Idaho
Posts: 7,665
Both are correct for their drawings. Somebody just forgot to compare them it sounds like. I would measure the action and tell EGW that's the hole spacing you need for an A-Bolt. Let them supply it.
__________________
There is no safe direction to point an unsafe gun.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-20-2017, 08:03 PM
MikeG's Avatar
The Hog Whisperer (Administrator)
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 32,920
If it works - then it works. Anything overhanging the ejection port, file it off if you don't like how it looks.

Doesn't seem worth sending the rifle back to Browning or sending the part back to the manufacturer, but that is my opinion. Up to you.
Darkker and Tnhunter like this.
__________________
MikeG

Quote:
Originally Posted by faucettb
Welcome to the forum. Rules are simple, be nice and join in.
Reply With Quote
 
  #4  
Old 01-21-2017, 02:31 AM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 402
EGW has been an easy company to work with. Contact them and and supply them with pictures showing the discrepancy.
Purist likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-21-2017, 08:43 AM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 606
Just took a quick glance at the rail you mentioned, the description says a bolt only, not ab3. You may want to verify you have the right rail for the right gun.

A-Bolt, A-Bolt II or AB3. What's the Difference?
Darkker likes this.
__________________
"Tell me what's wrong with the words or with you, that the thing is all right, but the word is taboo!"
-D.H. Lawrence
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2017, 04:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3
Both are A-Bolt II

Thanks for the response. I looked up the serial numbers att he Browning website. One was manufactured in 1995 and I he other in 1998. Both are A-Bolt II Rifles. I wanted to make I had verified the rifle model before I talked to EGW.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-02-2017, 07:32 PM
Beartooth Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 606
You know when you call tech support and they ask you if your whatever is plugged in,,, sorry, don't take offense, but this next question is like that.
Is the rail on backwards? If I'm not mistaken, the part overhanging the mount should be toward the barrel.
__________________
"Tell me what's wrong with the words or with you, that the thing is all right, but the word is taboo!"
-D.H. Lawrence
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-17-2017, 10:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3
Question Checked that too.

No offense taken. They are mounted with the overhang to the front of the receiver, sloping down from back to front. I actually did try reversing them but they are still off the same amount. I need to figure out how to upload pictures to this forum...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need help selecting a scope rail Sheperd Rifle, Shotgun and Handgun Scopes 6 03-15-2016 07:47 PM
Recoil pads, grind to fit or pre-fit by factory SHY_BEAR Gunsmithing 15 06-06-2013 02:09 PM
Richard's Micro Fit Stock Darin115 Gunsmithing 10 08-20-2010 10:48 AM
Rail for 92 FS?? mds1000 Handguns 0 06-02-2010 06:12 PM
How do I fit a scope base on this? naveedlodhi Gunsmithing 22 08-10-2008 09:23 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:26 PM.

< Contact Us - Shooters Forum - Archive - Privacy Statement >

 
 

All Content & Design Copyright © 1999-2002 Beartooth Bullets, All Rights Reserved
Privacy Statement | Contact Webmaster
Website Design & Development By Exbabylon Internet Solutions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1