Played with a pair of Marlin 62's, one in .256 (a favorite) and one in .30carbine (and I have to say, the most accurate .30carbine i ever got a chance to shoot).
You identified the .256wcf's major problem in the Marlin 62: the chambers were cut long. Now understand, the actual headspace is set by the thickness of the rim as it is a rimmed case. The action is too "springy" for pure neck sizing to work. Add to that, it is possible to have a round just barely chamber, but NOT lock the bolt (and it stings the crap out of your hand when that lever opens in a real big hurry..and then the case head runs around the range floor like a crazed big wheel).
With full power loads, best you can do is size a little less than full length and toss the cases after their 4th loading (or get cheap and use them with lite caset bullets at sub sonic speeds until they get lost, stepped on, or finally seperate). Best course is to size only until the action firmly locks closed.
I'd form mine from UNFIRED .357 brass by using a 7.62X25 (either a .30 mauser or .30Tok die) and working only with the top of the ram stroke. Loss in forming was about 4%. when imperial Die Wax was used as a lube.
Had two friends with .256 (both passed away) one with Merrill and one with a Hawkeye. He made a set of 2 dies to take .251" 50gr. FMJ's to a spitzer (or a spitzer FMJ if you fed them in backwards). A whole lot of those home made bullets made the trip downrange, and a good number of them splattered small varmits.
****ed shame...is a wonderful round for Martini Cadet conversion, and the marlin 62's tuened out to be more accurate then most people gave them credit for.
-------
Alwayes wanted to really test a Universal "Ferret"...basically a M1 30carbine converted to .256WCF. May not have been varmit accurate, but I bet it would have been a whole lot of fun.