Joined
·
572 Posts
This should be a most interesting thread. My only concession to a "popular" cartrage is the 38/357 which I realy like.
Is it fair to put the .41 in a "midrange" class? Seems to the bottom end of the Big Bores to me (and such a GREAT shooter!<!--emo&
--><img src="http://beartoothbullets.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=''><!--endemo-->
I hope you fella's plan on explaining to my wife why I may need a .32 or some such thing in the future ;*)
I do have an old .32 auto that followed my dad home from Germany. A fine shooter, but far too much history to use afield I'm thinkin
Scotty
Is it fair to put the .41 in a "midrange" class? Seems to the bottom end of the Big Bores to me (and such a GREAT shooter!<!--emo&
--><img src="http://beartoothbullets.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=''><!--endemo-->I hope you fella's plan on explaining to my wife why I may need a .32 or some such thing in the future ;*)
I do have an old .32 auto that followed my dad home from Germany. A fine shooter, but far too much history to use afield I'm thinkin
Scotty
