We have seen above a pretty good appreciation of chromed bores. They give good barrel life in terms of both corrosion and gas , especially if the rifle will be used in wet or humid conditions, or firing will be rapid or full auto. It is not surprising that Winchester used it for the bore-eating .264 Magnum while other Model 70s remained unchromed.
Hunting or military accuracy can be quite good, but is most unlikely to be better than that. I don't believe anybody ever heard of a benchrester using a chromed bore, slthough they have enthusiastically embraced stainless steel. The main reason for this is the difficulty of depositing chromium evenly along the bore and from one side to the next. A rifle's bore ought to either be entirely constant or tighten up on the bullet, and a chromed bore may do the reverse.
A problem nobody has mentioned is that the chamber, or at least its throat, needs to be chromed too. Otherwise the throat will be eroded faster there than the chromed lands and grooves, resulting in an irregular cavity with flakes of chromium breaking away. I suppose there is some chance of this happening even with the chromed chamber, and the rifle therefore retaining its accuracy for a long time, then having it suddenly collapse. Armies tend to use just one chambering per calibre, so chroming the chamber is no big deal for them. But it is unsuitable for producing chromed barrel blanks which will be chambered with a reamer afterwards.
I think chromed bores gained some specialist appeal in the days when stainless barrel steels weren't as good as they are today. The choice, if you have it, is extremely good preservation of fairly good accuracy with chrome, or fairly good preservation of extremely good accuracy with stainless.