That argument is indeed what he was saying and why his piece was so .....well, not well thought out. You can't compare the 2nd Amendment to yelling "fire" because that is not what the 1st or 2nd were about. To compare it to human sacrifice in religious practice is equally ridiculous. The taking of human life is murder and is not protected by the Constitution. The use of these two examples to demonstrate why he thinks the 2nd Amendment allows for regulation is just absurd. The Framers obviously felt the 2nd was different because they included the words "shall not be infringed." This is very strong language and when the preamble is studied there is no question as to their intent. To suggest some simple argument that says all rights are regulated and now lets talk limits is just ridiculous and shows a very clear lack of understanding about the Constitution regardless of what side of the gun control debate he is on. Go back to school, Dick.> He wrote, all constitutional rights are regulated,
There you go, they are suppose to be God given rights.
" Let's Talk Limits "
Obviously, whoever he was, he found a man has got to know his limits. He found his.
May future generations refer to him as "dick who?"