Germany 1720. This is from an auction site and I hope it is acceptable. It is different that is why i am posting it here. For curiousity's sake.
I like it
http://img17.imageshack.us/i/41172x5.jpg/
http://img17.imageshack.us/i/41172x5.jpg/
Direct ignition too. The powder burns from the center not the side. There is no pan. I have seen this before and it seems somewhat impractical because if you have a misfire your powder gets dumped. I wondered if there would be less misfires this way tho. Maybe the only way to know is to try it. The hammer is the only thing exposed on the lock. This is a very handsome fowler. I love old firearms! Just can't afford them unfortunately. I don't think anyone can say that underhammers are an American invention.One heck of a way to keep your powder dry, put the pan on the bottom!!
Make's for a slimmer gun, doesn't have all that lockwork hanging off the side.
We must be looking at different pictures. To me the pan is clearly visible above the frizzen and appears to be at least an inch away from the barrel, about as "indirect" as a flintlock could ever be made. Probably why it's in such good condition, it wasn't used much because it doesn't work.Direct ignition too. The powder burns from the center not the side. There is no pan. I have seen this before and it seems somewhat impractical because if you have a misfire your powder gets dumped. I wondered if there would be less misfires this way tho. Maybe the only way to know is to try it. The hammer is the only thing exposed on the lock. This is a very handsome fowler. I love old firearms! Just can't afford them unfortunately. I don't think anyone can say that underhammers are an American invention.