Joined
·
38 Posts
Currently on my 700 .300wm I have a Cabelas Alpha 3-12x40 scope. It came with the gun and is actually a surprisingly good scope. Bright, clear, good eye relief, and after hundreds of shots has never wandered off zero once.
However, my only complaint is that the reticle is a little too thick. It requires me to aim at 2" circles at 200 yards because it completely covers 1" circles.
I'm sold on Nikon because I bought one of their entry level Prostaff scopes for my 870. The 2-7x32 was only $100, and is really clear and crisp. After over 100 Lightfield 3" mags it's been completely flawless. Hunting last year, even towards the end of the day with very low light I could still see everything through it. Amazing!
I'm not a big fan of the BDC type reticle, so I'm choosing between the Nikoplex and the Mil-dot. My Nikon 2-7x32 has the Nikoplex, which I like because the reticle is very fine/thin.
Is the reticle on the Mil-dot as fine/thin as the Nikoplex?
Thanks!
However, my only complaint is that the reticle is a little too thick. It requires me to aim at 2" circles at 200 yards because it completely covers 1" circles.
I'm sold on Nikon because I bought one of their entry level Prostaff scopes for my 870. The 2-7x32 was only $100, and is really clear and crisp. After over 100 Lightfield 3" mags it's been completely flawless. Hunting last year, even towards the end of the day with very low light I could still see everything through it. Amazing!
I'm not a big fan of the BDC type reticle, so I'm choosing between the Nikoplex and the Mil-dot. My Nikon 2-7x32 has the Nikoplex, which I like because the reticle is very fine/thin.
Is the reticle on the Mil-dot as fine/thin as the Nikoplex?
Thanks!