1) Let's consider for a moment what you just said.
Someone online, leaving chunks of metal outside in the rain for a few days, or seeing if a McDonalds cup will instantly dissolve is "Real Testing" as it applies to guns. But someone else online that actually uses a product on their guns, for years, that doesn't count as real testing.
DIY did a good job on his thread, and I'm glad he shared. To me, those tests don't constitute what would approximate real world. Do you leave your guns outside, specifically directly in the elements for a few days? Are your guns made of styrofoam? Should they be able to slide down a hill? I know I'm making light of testing points, but how applicable are they to you? Are those better data points than someone who cares everyday, or shoots everyday?
Let's consider my example of Ed's Red cleaner. It's been around for ages. It, from what I've read and heard, was used by military people in military rifles. That is some real world testing. They shoot a lot in a wide variety of weapons in ways that most civilians can't. They also test things before it is put in the hands of people who need that product to work to save their lives. Dead solders don't fight well. For me, Ed's Red has three things going for it. Length of time it has been used. Used by the military for a long time as well. Plus, it only cleans so is only in the gun for short periods of time. It really only cleans but could lubricate I guess to a point.
Mobil 1, SuperTech engine oil from Walmart or other engine oils hasn't been tested in the same way and I would strongly suspect that the formula is not the same today as it was 30 years ago, or maybe even last week. For a car engine, I would argue that those oils are likely better but as to using them in guns, I'm not sure.
As to the DIY_guy tests, things like that could happen. I've had tree limbs fall on the house and had leaks, some pretty good size. It seems when it rains here, it does it sometimes for several days which makes repairs interesting. So, if a limb falls on my roof and the rain leaks onto my guns, I would like to have something that I could rely on. As I sit here, I have one tree that I'm worried about. I'm not just worried about a limb but the whole tree.
2) Grease. Why on Earth would you not use a regular automotive grease? Ed's Red will cost say $20/gallon, where a cute little 5oz bottle of any other cleaner will cost the same or more; I get that. Grease isn't expensive, like cleaner is, and you don't need gallons of it to keep a weapon lubed. If piling up stuff you'll never use is your game, they sell grease in 35 & 55-gal drums. Buying enough canola or coconuts to press them out will be very expensive.
I may do that. I'd like to know if anyone has tested it and knows it works the same or better as a gun grease. I've read about a Shell grease 33MS that seems to have been used by the military in their guns. Thing is, the name changed since then and I don't know if the formula did as well or if the name change was it and the grease is the same.
Welcome Dalek, look forward to more of your posts.
First.....are you asking about rust protection...OR cleaning?
I've used #40 motor oil for case lube, bore cleaning, and rust protection. No experiment needed; it works fine. For case lube you have to understand how much to use.
Hoppe#9 sell for less then $25 for a quart.......should last a preper his lifetime.
I bulk these standard chemicals are inexpensive; and have a LONG shelf life. Who knows what the shelf life and stability are for "internet concoctions". Just get what you like in a quart quality and 'relax'.
I wish there was a overall test result, somewhere. For me, I would like a gun oil to prevent rusting, lubricate, prevent wear and anything else a gun needs. Some of the tests done by DIY_guy was interesting for the test performed but as usual, you improve one thing but take away from something else. There is likely a additive that can be put in that will prevent rust no matter what. Thing is, that may make it not lubricate well or even make it wear faster. Balance, just have to balance.
In all honesty, if something bad happened, I'd use what I have, engine oil if needed, but would like to have something that would make my guns last as long as possible. I try to buy as good a gun as I can afford, as good a ammo as I can afford and would like to get as good a gun cleaning/lubing product(s) as I can buy.
As a professional lube formulator (and physicist) acquaintance has told me before: The demands of a firearm lube are relatively simple and few, but they're different from those of an engine or transmission (paraphrased). Too, most gun lubes are not actually gun lubes, mainly because the people marketing them have no idea what a gun lube needs to be. They're mostly off-the-shelf products, generally from the automotive realm (again, paraphrased). So, if you want something optimized for firearms, you need to be able to figure out who is doing that and buy their product. Or, you can go to school and to work to learn how to formulate and blend your own products, or find a friend who is a shooter who has done all that.
If you just want 'good enough,' which is the very best that most products are anyway, then over 100 years of firearms use history reveals that's it's not really that important what you use, so long as you use _something_.
How about if you do the testing, OP, and make a nice thread like DIY guy did? Or put some vids up on YouTube?
I see the point and that is one reason I am asking the question. I believe that gun oils are at least similar to other oils. I mentioned above the Shell grease. If it is the same that was used ages ago with no change in the formula, wonderful. I'd buy a tube of it and use that for things that need grease. The whole deal of engine oil being used for a long time is pretty convincing but my question was, has anyone tested them and shared the results? Is any one thing better than others?
If I had the tools to do one, I'd do it for sure. I'd first get ideas on how to do the testing, what should be tested and then try to test as many different oils as I could. Thing is, I don't have the tools to do it.
Thanks to all for sharing ideas/thoughts. If no one else knows of any testing done on this then I guess it wasn't my searching skills that were lacking, just a lack of any testing and their results being public.