It looks great. This is my best shooting rifleWhat does it look like ? I had some horrible looking milsurp rifles that shot pretty good.
Hmm, I'm curious as to what prompted your opening post question?It looks great. This is my best shooting rifle
The picture kinda shows the purpose of the question lolHmm, I'm curious as to what prompted your opening post question?
Well, not really. While your photo is certainly not a definitive test or inspection of the bore size/condition or [more importantly] the condition of the crown, it's at least a 'rough indicator' that the muzzle has not been 'wallowed out' by abusive cleaning (as Jack Belk indicated above). One can clearly see that the bullet diameter is greater than the diameter of the bore across the rifling. What prompted my question is/was your statement that "It looks great. This is my best shooting rifle." That being the case, and your (seeming) satisfaction with your rifle, can you elaborate upon your concern and/or issue that prompted you to open this post with a question as to "Is the bore okay on this K31?" Are you seeing or experiencing something that is not evident in the photo alone?The picture kinda shows the purpose of the question lol
I’ve just always heard that if the bullet is almost swallowed in that test then it indicates a worn out bore. I just wanted to get an opinion from people who I figured had a lot more knowledge than I do in this topic.Well, not really. While your photo is certainly not a definitive test or inspection of the bore size/condition or [more importantly] the condition of the crown, it's at least a 'rough indicator' that the muzzle has not been 'wallowed out' by abusive cleaning (as Jack Belk indicated above). One can clearly see that the bullet diameter is greater than the diameter of the bore across the rifling. What prompted my question is/was your statement that "It looks great. This is my best shooting rifle." That being the case, and your (seeming) satisfaction with your rifle, can you elaborate upon your concern and/or issue that prompted you to open this post with a question as to "Is the bore okay on this K31?" Are you seeing or experiencing something that is not evident in the photo alone?
What are you talking about? Or, what are you trying to say?CC,
Remember the other thread, where a decade off didn't help?
I wouldn't over-think this one too much. The pattern is very similar.
Cheers
I always heard that the bullet test will show you how worn out a bore is and I just wanted second opinions. Idk why some of these guys are being rude about itIf it's accurate, then it isn't worn out. What's to worry about?![]()
When you consider that typical rifling depth is .003"-.004", meaning you only have .006"-.008" supporting a bullet that is simply resting on the muzzle. In reality, that's not much when one is trying to do an imprecise 'eyeball measurement'. A bore scope will allow for a better 'inspection'. What my 'eyeball' is telling me is that the resting position of the ogive of that particular bullet indicates your bore is fine and you have nothing to worry about, which seems confirmed by your satisfaction of actual shooting results.I always heard that the bullet test will show you how worn out a bore is and I just wanted second opinions. Idk why some of these guys are being rude about it
Use a different 30 caliber cartridge, Ogives on projectiles are different between mfg and bullet types.I always heard that the bullet test will show you how worn out a bore is and I just wanted second opinions. Idk why some of these guys are being rude about it
That test is a crude quick test for funneling a prospective gun buyer often uses to assess the likelihood that a gun will shoot accurately. Once you have the gun, the test is meaningless as then you determine if it shoots well by shooting with it.I always heard that the bullet test will show you how worn out a bore is and I just wanted second opinions. Idk why some of these guys are being rude about it