Shooters Forum banner

Mounting strain gauge on Contender pistol

864 Views 5 Replies 5 Participants Last post by  MusgraveMan
Hi,

Question (a repeat from my intro in General):

How do you mount a chamber pressure strain gauge over the center of the chamber of a Contender? To try to stay away from the barrel cross section changes of the barrel locking lug, on top of the barrel seems to be the ideal. BUT, over the chamber, on top, is where the sights or sight base for a scope is mounted.

I want to test pressures in .357 Herrett (iron sights), .223 Rem (scope mount), .44 Rem Mag (ribbed barrel with the shot spreader removed) barrels (more IF I can afford them). It is a GEN 1 frame.

Open to ideas/suggestions/blueprints!!!!

2Tall
1 - 1 of 6 Posts
Hi,

Question (a repeat from my intro in General):

How do you mount a chamber pressure strain gauge over the center of the chamber of a Contender? To try to stay away from the barrel cross section changes of the barrel locking lug, on top of the barrel seems to be the ideal. BUT, over the chamber, on top, is where the sights or sight base for a scope is mounted.

I want to test pressures in .357 Herrett (iron sights), .223 Rem (scope mount), .44 Rem Mag (ribbed barrel with the shot spreader removed) barrels (more IF I can afford them). It is a GEN 1 frame.

Open to ideas/suggestions/blueprints!!!!

2Tall
A great deal can be said about stretch gauge mounting but one does not want to state stuff that already are common knowledge for the potential user. Apart from the Contender's outside chamber profile which I have not studied up close I assume that the OP understands that using this mode of measurement is not a good way to build up a load to nominated pressure levels that had been published by the piezzo-electric way of measurement.

And furthermore, particularly to not use it to achieve maximum pressures measured by SAAMI or CIP. Please do not go towards maximum pressure levels indicated by Quickload - as for all its expense QL uses simplistic formulae that had been developed for particularly the 30-06 and .308W cases and have up to a 16% negative calculation error for any cartridge showing any amount of overbore. -16% means that you will get a 16% overpressure by building towards the QL figure given as maximum.

Building a user-defined database of own pressure traces and safe maximum values based on known velocities is the clever way to go. Can one ever overstate the following?: "There is not one iota of value in attempting to wring the last 50 ft/sec from a cartridge bullet combination". Why would one want his expensive, nice rifle to be working at maximum rpm every time he turns on the ignition?
See less See more
1 - 1 of 6 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top