Joined
·
327 Posts
I have a Remington 1100 Special Purpose that I bought sometime around 1996. It has a black synthetic stock and matte finish and came with a 21" fully rifled barrel. Very soon thereafter I modified it with a Sidesaddle 6-shell carrier and extended magazine tube, the latter of which required that I drill out the two dents at the end of the factory tube to get the shells to actually enter the extended portion. It's never cycled with low-base shells, but I've been led to believe that may be because the slug barrel was gas-ported for magnums. Makes sense.
I recently bought this barrel for it: http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/default.aspx?productNumber=837364
When I went to install it, I discovered the fore end support piece had been broken for quite some time. This gun had been shot very infrequently, probably less than a couple dozen shells its entire life.
So I ordered a new fore end support and O-ring barrel seal (why not, right?) from Brownells. I have since cleaned the shotgun and installed the fore end support and new O-ring seal.
But the new barrel would not go on. It would stop about 3/16" from fully seating. I then turned it so that the lug recess portion was not trying to go into the receiver at the same time. Still stopped at the same point. The original slug barrel would still go on, however.
I took off the O-ring and the new barrel would go on. I reinstalled the old O-ring and the barrel would still go on. But not with the new O-ring. I cannot detect any differences between the two O-rings with the naked eye. Call that weird, but I guess I can live with the old O-ring, right? Well, then I hit the new problem that is still preventing me from using my 1100.
With the new barrel installed, the fore end will not seat fully. It stops with the end of magazine tube flush with the fore end instead of letting the threaded portion extend past it.
Turns out, this is the same distance as the width of a step machined into the cylinder below the slug barrel that is not present in the new barrel.
Is there a reason for the differences between these two barrels that prevent me from using the original fore end? Do I have to buy a new fore end to use the new barrel? I've been told that all 1100 barrels should be interchangeable.
Am I just missing seeing something? Thanks.
I recently bought this barrel for it: http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/default.aspx?productNumber=837364
When I went to install it, I discovered the fore end support piece had been broken for quite some time. This gun had been shot very infrequently, probably less than a couple dozen shells its entire life.
So I ordered a new fore end support and O-ring barrel seal (why not, right?) from Brownells. I have since cleaned the shotgun and installed the fore end support and new O-ring seal.
But the new barrel would not go on. It would stop about 3/16" from fully seating. I then turned it so that the lug recess portion was not trying to go into the receiver at the same time. Still stopped at the same point. The original slug barrel would still go on, however.
I took off the O-ring and the new barrel would go on. I reinstalled the old O-ring and the barrel would still go on. But not with the new O-ring. I cannot detect any differences between the two O-rings with the naked eye. Call that weird, but I guess I can live with the old O-ring, right? Well, then I hit the new problem that is still preventing me from using my 1100.
With the new barrel installed, the fore end will not seat fully. It stops with the end of magazine tube flush with the fore end instead of letting the threaded portion extend past it.
Turns out, this is the same distance as the width of a step machined into the cylinder below the slug barrel that is not present in the new barrel.
Is there a reason for the differences between these two barrels that prevent me from using the original fore end? Do I have to buy a new fore end to use the new barrel? I've been told that all 1100 barrels should be interchangeable.
Am I just missing seeing something? Thanks.