Joined
·
52 Posts
If you were to purhase a new Ruger Hawkeye in .257 Roberts, would it be the standard or ultra light? I noticed that Ruger has taken the ultra light our of there lineup on their web page. Wonder why? They quit making them?
If you are going to buy a Ruger M-77 "Hawkeye", in .257 Roberts, then BUY THE STANDARD rifle. I had an ultralight in .308 & it was worthless!!If you were to purhase a new Ruger Hawkeye in .257 Roberts, would it be the standard or ultra light? I noticed that Ruger has taken the ultra light our of there lineup on their web page. Wonder why? They quit making them?
If you're interested in the Ultralight for it's shorter, 40-1/2" overall length and not just the lightweight barrel and weight savings, you could get the standard Hawkeye and cut 2" off the barrel- that way you won't have the headaches of a skinny, whippy barrel. Any good gunsmith can do this with minimal expense.If you were to purhase a new Ruger Hawkeye in .257 Roberts, would it be the standard or ultra light?
I doubt if it would make a whole lot of difference. I also didn't care for the "Matte" bluing Ruger has on their Hawkeye rifles. I liked the regular bluing they had on their MKII's much better. The current "Matte" finish looks cheap!!the roberts barrel would be a bit stiffer due to the extra .050" of wall thickness but that may or may not make any difference...
To make the "Bob" really sing, go with the standard configuration. A 22" bbrl is about perfect, and less is cutting the performance too much.If you were to purhase a new Ruger Hawkeye in .257 Roberts, would it be the standard or ultra light?
i've never shot an ultralight ruger but i do have a model 7 in 7/08 and i agree that it is definately an adjustment compared to a full sized rifle!! i use an uncle buds bull bag so that really helps. i used my model 7 this fall and filled my tags but noticed that it is harder to shoot offhand when the pulse rate is up and winded, all the more reason to use a bi/tripod of some sort or a good walking stick!
I agree, I have a 700 classic with a new 24" shilen barrel that is extremely accurate. With the 110 grain Accubond, it is a killer on hogs, which is all I've used it for. I don't know why that caliber ever "fell from grace" with the shooting public. It is a very shooter friendly rifle with plenty of power.If you are going to buy a Ruger M-77 "Hawkeye", in .257 Roberts, then BUY THE STANDARD rifle. I had an ultralight in .308 & it was worthless!!The best it could do is 6" groups @ 100 yards with both factory & reloads. I think the barrel was just too light for the caliber and this "Whimpy" barrel vibrated all over the place when shot. I since sold my Ruger Ultralight "Hawkeye" to a Ruger Collector who was looking for one in .308. BUT I lost as lot of money around $250!!!!
Your Standard Ruger "Should" be okay.
![]()
The Ruger ultralight has a "special" made light weight thin barrel. On the Remington Model 7's the barrel is heavier made with a larger barrel diameter. Both barrels on the the Ruger & Remington are 20" with the Remington barrel being heavier. Harry is correct.harry, yeah i know but i was just throwing that out there for thought. to me the difference is merely the name on the rifle otherwise they are both lightweight 20" barreled rifles...