Joined

·
416 Posts

DC

1 - 13 of 13 Posts

Joined

·
416 Posts

DC

But the Taylor knok out value is a very good cartridge comparison formula.

bullet dia. X bullet weight X muzzle velocity / 7000 gns.

.458 x 465 X 2300 fps / 7000 =69.975

this is a way to compare different cartridges that you know will work, to compare against cartridges you want to see if they will work.

Hope this helps,

Halfbreed

Joined

·
416 Posts

DC

Hi DMC,DMC said:

DC

I was cruising over the old posts and I saw your question. I am curious also as to what the Thorniley formula is. I have ran some numbers through it and the formula appears to be the following.

=2.866*velocity[fps]*(bullet weight[grains]/7000)*SquareRoot(bullet diameter[in])

The square root of the bullet diameter explains why the Thorniley stopping power value does not weigh diameter as heavily as the Taylor formula does.

Joined

·
2,429 Posts

I give you another factor formula that I have developed, for you to play with, based on some things we have learned along the way. The others are based on a non-expanding bullet.....mine works both ways:

Maplat Area X Sectional Density X Velocity = Power Factor

Try it out!.........James

Joined

·
4 Posts

James,James Gates said:

I give you another factor formula that I have developed, for you to play with, based on some things we have learned along the way. The others are based on a non-expanding bullet.....mine works both ways:

Maplat Area X Sectional Density X Velocity = Power Factor

Try it out!.........James

Haven't tried your formula yet, but it's interesting. What about bullets that have a very small Maplat area, e.g. pointed bullets? Since you are including Maplat area in your formula, does this imply that you're a hard-cast guy?

Brian

Joined

·
2,429 Posts

Since I first started playing with a comparison factor, I realized that Sectional Density should replace Weight.

Sectional Density X Meplat Area x Velocity = Factor.

This factor formula takes into consideration the expanded MA where the others do not.

When you are playing with Peter Thornily formula, etc.....remember that are for non-expanding solids!

The only problem is recovering expanded jacked bullets to measure the MA.....but it can be done with a little work and water soaked paper situated at various ranges. Here we really see the diference in velocity and MA on jacketed bullets at various ranges.

I have never been satisfied that the ft/lbs of energy was a real yardstick for comparing Lethal Potential of various loads. At best it is a potential. Bullet design governs MA.

Regards, James

Joined

·
2,429 Posts

Here's one that can be used to compare one bulet load to another!

Joined

·
2,429 Posts

A non-expanding bullet with a large Meplat Area does not lose SD.

Regards, James

Joined

·
416 Posts

How much does it expand? A bullet that expands to 2X its diameter winds up with a pretty anemic SD of 1/4 the SD of the same bullet that doesn't expand.

What medium will cause expansion? I have some bullets that are so stout that they will expand only in a very dense medium - flesh won't do it.

How much weight will the bullet shed on its trip? Jacket seperation, lead pieces breaking off, etc.

How quickly - at what depth - is expansion achieved?

Personally, I prefer a flat-nose, non-expanding bullet for

DC

Joined

·
2,429 Posts

In calibers below .357" .....such as my .30-06....I go with a jacketed bullet that has proven performance in game.

Just some thoughts....James

1 - 13 of 13 Posts

Join the discussion

Shooters Forum

A forum community dedicated to Sport shooters, owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, hand casting bullets, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!

Full Forum Listing
Recommended Communities

Join now to ask and comment!