Just received my Uberti 1885 in 45/70 and while in the shop I did a side-by-side comparison of it to the newer style Browning he had on hand, the Uberti seems like a nice gun but of course hardly the same quality as the the Browning. Since differences between the two are being discussed here I would like to add my observations and that would be basically that comparing these two guns, or the new Browning to an original, is simply comparing "Apples to Oranges"! They seem to share little in common, so little in fact I wonder about comparing them at all. Other than a somewhat similar outward appearance, and really they differ significantly in appearance when compared side-by-side, they share almost nothing in design except for the basic type of action. Please don't misunderstand I am not trying to "knock" either design and I certainly don't intend disagree with anyone's opinion on these guns I only wanted to comment on just how much difference there seems to be between these two rifles.
That Browning was so nice I almost came home with both guns, might just have to run back down there before it gets away!
That Browning was so nice I almost came home with both guns, might just have to run back down there before it gets away!