John Wootters two articles on the .25 Copperhead were in Handloader No. 18, February 1969 and Rifle No. 22, October 1972. Wayne Blackwell’s article on the .25 X 47 was in Rifle No. 37, January 1975. These were quite awhile back.
“The rifle I have is an old Sako L461 that I got for $750 AU with a harris bipod as well as being bedded, floated and with a worked on trigger, but its too good to sell now the .14 wont go ahead.”
The Sako sure is popular. I don’t see many of them in use but I read quite a bit about them.
“This rifle wont be used for professional 'roo shooting, but its somthing that I would like to have a shot at. Have you heard about our pro rabbit shooters?”
Yes, I have a friend who was raised by his Grandparents who were kangaroo hunters right after WWII. His stories of their daily life are interesting – life was hard.
The amount of ammunition they fired was amazing. My friend is quick with a knife and will not use the new high tech blades. Carbon steel for him, with a stone in his pocket too keep the edge.
“I have a brno model 2 made in 1957 that spent 15 years or so as a pro shooters rifle, and believe me it has fired alot of rounds.”
Just like a high mileage truck and the cost of fuel, the cost of the ammunition fired through that rifle would far exceed its new value. My friend says the scopes they used when he was a kid were small and dark compared to today’s large objective scopes. Irons sights were in wide spread uses and large night beads were common.
“So I am now tied between the .250 myra the 25 TCU, .25X47 or the .243 myra, .6mm TCU or the .6X47.”
For me it would be a choice between the .250 myra (or .25 Copperhead) and the .25 TCU. For you bullet selection has to be a secondary factor. According to Snow it seems just about everything is available to you, if not in your home community, then a phone call away. The important thing is you are not trying to make a living at this. If you were it would change everything.
“Which cartridge would you recomend for the little sako, as I dont want to use bullets heavier than 80 or so grains, and would like the trajectory to be reasonably flat to 200 yards.”
Jack makes a very good point about COAL in the small action. With today’s long plastic tip bullets it is something to consider. My selection of bullets for the small .25 caliber cartridges hinges around the Sierra flat base 75-grain hollow point. I like the way this bullet acts on small critters and the accuracy in several of my rifles is excellent. For slightly larger critters – small deer size – I like the 100-grain Speer JHP, also a flat base bullet. The 87-grain Sierra Varminter is another good bullet but I tend to look lighter for higher velocity or heavier for more punch.
The 85-grain Nosler ballistic tip and the 75-grain Hornady A-Max give superb accuracy in every rifle I have tried them in but they cost .23¢ each for the Nosler and .18¢ each for the Hornady, plus shipping. I buy the Sierra 75-grain JHP’s for .14¢ each.
You have your version of Hodgdon’s 419 and 322 so powder selection will be a simple matter of what your rifle prefers. For several reason I would choose the 24” barrel too.
Keep in mind I am no expert on these cartridges. My limited experience lies with the .25-20 WCF, .256 Win. Mag, .25-35 WCF, .25-35AI and the .250 Savage. The one man in my local area who was a genuine expert with these small capacity cartridges, Professor G. O. Ashley, is dead and gone. There does not seem to be a great number of “seat of the pants” wildcatters around anymore. If they are around they write for magazines I have not discovered yet.
Do you know of a fellow Australian named Greg Matthews?
Keep us posted on your thoughts